Bevel: Case Report

Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Case Report

Bindiya PK, Samreen Taufiq, Selvamani M

Abstract

Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma is a rare tumour, but a well-known entity affecting the bones of the jaws. It comprises 2 - 4% of all mucoepidermoid carcinomas. Occurrence in maxilla is rarely reported. This case report presents a central mucoepidermoid carcinoma in the maxilla of a 17-year-old female patient.

 

Keywords: Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma; Maxilla; Malignant Salivary Gland Neoplasm; Mucus Cells.

 

Bindiya PK, Samreen Taufiq, Selvamani M. Central Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Case Report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology 2019:10(1):15-18. ©International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Published by Publishing Division, Celesta Software Private Limited. All Rights Reserved.

 


Introduction

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common malignant salivary gland neoplasm. It has the second highest frequency of occurrence among all salivary gland tumors.1 It is the commonest salivary gland neoplasm in adults as well as in children and comprises of mucus secreting cells, epidermoid cells and intermediate cells in varying combinations forming cysts and solid islands.2 They are histologically low grade and usually affects the mandible. Occurrence in maxilla is rarely reported.3

 

Most of the reported cases of this lesion are asymptomatic and appear as unilocular or multilocular radiolucency found during routine dental examinations.1 Atypical salivary gland neoplasms arising within the jaws as primary central bony lesions are extremely rare. They represent 2-4.3% of all MECs reported.4-6

 

Case Report

A 17-year-old female patient reported with a chief complaint of pain and swelling on the right side of face since three months. History of present illness revealed that the swelling initially was small which gradually has enlarged to the present size and was associated with occasional mild pain. Patient gave a history of trauma to the anterior teeth region on the right side of the face, three years back. Upon extra oral examination, a solitary swelling on the right side of face involving the zygomatic region, extending from ala of nose to the zygomatic arch anteroposteriorly and from occlusal line of premolars to infra orbital margin supero-inferiorly was identified.(Figure 1) The swelling measured approximately three centimetres in diameter and was almost oval in shape with a rough texture of the overlying skin. On palpation, all the inspectory findings were confirmed along with tenderness, firm consistency and absence of any kind of discharge. The swelling appeared to be fixed to the underlying structures. Intraorally there was obliteration of the upper right buccal vestibule and teeth #14 and #15 appeared to be  non-vital upon vitality test.

Figure 1: The clinical picture showing swelling on the right side of the face.

 

Orthopantomograph showed an unilocular radiolucency with ragged borders and thick sclerotic margins extending from periapical area of tooth #14 to #16 till the lower border of the maxillary sinus.(Figure 2) The 3D reconstructed computed tomography (CT) image showed the destruction of the bone in the maxillary region.(Figure 3) Thus on the basis of overall clinical and radiological findings, a provisional diagnosis of odontogenic tumour of right maxilla was agreed.

On histopathological examination, hematoxylin and eosin stained sections revealed tumour mass containing connective tissue stroma interspersed with numerous mucin containing cystic spaces lined by mucinous cells.(Figure 4) Nests and cords of epidermoid and intermediate cells, interspersed with mucous cells (Figure 5) and, sheets of clear cells were also evident.(Figure 6) Based on the clinical, radiographic and histopathological features, the lesion was diagnosed as mucoepidermoid carcinoma.

 

Figure 2: The Orthopantomograph showing the unilocular radiolucency with ragged borders

 

Figure 3: The 3D reconstructed CT image showing the destruction of the bone in the maxilla.

 

Figure 4: The photomicrographs of H & E stained sections shows tumour islands with multiple cysts containing mucin and nests and cords of tumour cells (10x).

 

Figure 5: The photomicrographs of H & E stained section shows nest of tumour cells made of epithelial and intermediate cells and interspersed with mucous cells (100x)

 

Figure 6: The photomicrographs of H & E stained section shows sheets of clear cells (40x)

 

Discussion

Loos in 1913 described Intraosseous carcinoma arising in the jaw bones as a central epidermoid carcinoma.7 The term ‘‘primary intraosseous carcinoma’’ (PIOC) was coined by Pindborg in the first edition of the World Health Organization classification for the histopathological typing of the odontogenic tumors.8

Š       Type 1 PIOC ex odontogenic cyst

Š       Type 2a Malignant ameloblastoma

Š       Type 2b Ameloblastic carcinoma arising de novo, ex ameloblastoma or ex odontogenic cyst

Š       Type 3 PIOC arising de novo: (a) keratinizing type (b) non-keratinizing type

Š       Type 4 Intraosseous MEC

 

Kochaji et al. published the criteria for diagnosis of intraosseous MEC 6,9,10

Š       Presence of an intact cortical plate

Š       Radiological evidence of bone destruction

Š       Histological confirmation

Š       Positive mucin staining

Š       Absence of primary lesion in the salivary gland

Š       Exclusion of an odontogenic tumour.

 

Histopathological criteria for MEC diagnosis as per Seifert11, Sobin12 and Auclair et al13 the tumours are graded for malignancy as follows:

Š       Low Grade: Highly differentiated neoplasia with a predominance of macro and micro cysts. Presence of intermediate and mucin-producing cells.

Š       Intermediate Grade: Predominance of intermediate cells and a few cysts. Presence of mucin-producing cells and islands of epidermoid cells.

Š       High Grade: Poorly differentiated neoplasia with predominance of intermediate and epidermoid cells in solid blocks. Mucin-producing cells are present.

 

Various possibilities for the origin of MEC are 14,15

Š       Entrapment of the retro-molar mucous glands within the mandible, which later undergo neoplastic transformation.

Š       Embryonic remnants of the submandibular and sublingual glands trapped within the mandible during development.

Š       Neoplastic transformation and invasion from the lining of the maxillary sinus.

Š       Neoplastic transformation of the mucous secreting cells from the epithelial lining of the dentigerous cyst associated with impacted third molars.

 

Possibilities for origin in the present case could be due to neoplastic transformation and invasion from the lining of the maxillary sinus and neoplastic transformation of entrapped minor salivary glands within the maxilla. Age of incidence is 1st to 7th decade of life. In adults it occurs mostly in females and more often in the posterior mandible.4 Radiographic examination is important for categorizing it as a central jaw lesion and to know the extent of the lesion with involvement or encroachment of adjacent vital structures and hence concluding the diagnosis.

 

Brook stone and Huvos9 suggested a three-grade classification for intraosseous MEC.

Š       Grade 1: Without expansion and rupture of cortical plate.

Š       Grade 2: With expansion but without rupture of cortical plate.

Š       Grade 3: With rupture of cortical plates or presence of regional metastasis.

 

Though panoramic radiography is a simple and cost effective imaging modality for jaw lesions, lesions involving maxilla require a CT imaging. CT gives a better information about the extent of the lesion, which is particularly needed in cases involving the maxilla because involvement of floor of the orbit, nasal fossa, maxillary sinus, etc., will change the treatment and prognosis of such cases in a major way. Management of central intraosseous MEC is through surgery, which includes curettage, enucleation, marsupialization and wide local excision.3,16,17 As a rule, even the low-grade MEC’s should be managed by wide local resection, en-bloc resection, hemi-mandibulectomy or hemi-maxillectomy.9,18,19 Neck dissection is usually part of the treatment in cases where metastasis to the cervical nodes is suspected.19 Radiotherapy is recommended for high-grade MEC cases.19,20 These tumours usually have a good overall prognosis, but central MEC cases should be followed-up for a longer period due to the possibility of late recurrence or regional metastasis. Death may occur if there is extension into vital structures such as the base of the brain.12,15

 

Conclusion

Central MEC of the maxilla is a rare lesion. Modern investigation methods like CT can accurately identify the extent of the lesion and thereby a correct treatment can be given to the patient. Long term follow-up is very important in these cases to identify recurrences at the earliest.

 

Author Affiliations

1.Dr.Bindiya PK, Post Graduate Student, MAHE Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Chalakkara, Palloor, Mahe – 673310 (UT of Pondicherry), 2.Dr.Samreen Taufiq, Senior Lecturer, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly 243006 (U.P.) 3.Dr.Selvamani M, Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, MAHE Institute of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Chalakkara, Palloor, Mahe – 673310 (UT of Pondicherry),

 

References

1.     Ellis GL, Auclair PL, Gnepp DR. Surgical Pathology of the Salivary Glands: Vol 25 in the Major Problems in Pathology Series: WB Saunders Company, 1991.

2.     Cullings F. Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier, 2013.

3.     Subramaniam D, Venkatesh S, Chandrababulu S. Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxilla–case report. Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology 2016;3:736-8.

4.     Raut D, Khedkar S. Primary intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the maxilla: A case report and review of literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:163-8.

5.     Bouquot JE, Gnepp DR, Dardick I, Hietanen JH. Intraosseous salivary tissue: jawbone examples of choristomas, hamartomas, embryonic rests, and inflammatory entrapment: another histogenetic source for intraosseous adenocarcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:205-17.

6.     Kochaji N, Goossens A, Bottenberg P. Central Mucoepidermoid carcinoma: case report, literature review for missing and available information and guideline proposal for coming case reports. Oral Oncology 2004;40:95-105.

7.     Falaki F, Delavarian Z, Salehinejad J, Saghafi S. Squamous cell carcinoma arising from an odontogenic keratocyst: a case report. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14:E171-4.

8.     Waldron CA, Mustoe TA. Primary intraosseous carcinoma of the mandible with probable origin in an odontogenic cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;67:716-24.

9.     Brookstone MS, Huvos AG: Central salivary gland tumors of the maxilla and mandible: a clinicopathologic study of 11 cases with an analysis of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:229-36.

10.  Dhawan I, Bhargava S, Nayak N, Gupta R. Central salivary gland tumors of jaws. Cancer 1970;26:211-7.

11.  Seifert G. WHO international histological classification of tumors. Histological Typing of Salivary Gland Tumors. World Health Organization 1991:22-3.

12.  Seifert G, Sobin LH. The world health organization's histological classification of salivary gland tumors. A commentary on the second edition. Cancer 1992;70:379-85.

13.  Auclair PL, Goode RK, Ellis GL. Mucoepidermoid carcinoma of intraoral salivary glands evaluation and application of grading criteria in 143 cases. Cancer 1992;69:2021-30.

14.  Gingell JC, Beckerman T, Levy BA, LA S. Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Review of the literature and report of a case associated with an apical periodontal cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;4:436–46.

15.  Waldron CA, Koh ML. Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the jaws: report of four cases with analysis of the literature and discussion of the relationship to mucoepidermoid, sialodontogenic, and glandular odontogenic cysts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:871-7.

16.  Pires F, De Almeida OP, Lopes M, Perez DEDC, Kowalski L. Central mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the mandible: report of four cases with long-term follow-up. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2003;32:378-82.

17.  Tapia J, Aguirre A, Garvey M, Zeid M. Mandibular unilocular radiolucency with ill-defined borders. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;3:301-6.

18.  Eversole LR, Sabes WR. Aggressive growth and neoplastic potential of odontogenic cysts. Cancer J Clin 1975;35:270-82.

19.  Caccamese JF Jr, RA O. Pediatric mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the palate. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2002;31:136-9.

20.  Maremonti M, Califano L, Mangone GM, Zupi A GC. Intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma: report of a long-term evolution case. Oral Oncol 2001;137:110-13.

 

Corresponding Author

Dr. Bindiya PK,

Care a Complete Dental Clinic,

Ram Mohan Road,

Calicut – 673004, Kerala.

Email: bindiya000@gmail.com


 

 

 

 

Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None Declared.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Indexed In Ebscohost Index Copernicus UlrichsWebOpenJGateGoogle Scholar DOAJ Gale Cengage Learning Research Gate
line
System Developed By Stanford University Arizona State University Simon Fraser University Canadian Centre For Studies In Publishing University of British Columbia - Faculty of Education
W3C XHTML v1.0 Verified W3C verified Valid CSS v2.1 PHP5 Enabled Made On Mac Apache Enabled MySQL Powered
Published by Celesta Software Pvt Ltd